The Mailbox Rule and Related Rules

Prof. Tom W. Bell


NB: For a better and more recent version of this document, please see The Mailbox Rule and Related Rules [PDF format].

I. Rules for Forming Contracts via Correspondence

  1. Generally, acceptance is effective when sent, regardless of whether it reaches the offeror. See Restatement (2nd) § 63.

    1. But note that exceptions apply (see id.):
      1. if the offer provides otherwise,
      2. if acceptance is not made in a manner and by a medium invited by the offer, or
      3. to acceptance under an option contract, which is effective upon receipt by the offeror.

    2. Note also that id. § 40 modifies the mailbox rule when an earlier rejection arrives before a later acceptance (see below).


  2. Generally, revocation is effective when received by the offeree. See Restatement (2nd) § 42. But note that an exception applies in the case of option contracts, per id. § 37.

  3. Generally, rejection or counter-offer is effective when received by the offeror. See Restatement (2nd) § 40. But note that, per id., an acceptance sent after an otherwise effective rejection or counter-offer:

    1. operates only as a counter-offer if the offeror receives it after the earlier-sent rejection or counter-offer (thus providing an exception to the mailbox rule); and
    2. operates as an acceptance if the offeror receives it before the earlier-sent rejection or counter-offer.

  4. A useful mnemonic: Acceptance on answer; revocation or rejection on receipt.

II. Applying the Rules

  1. Reading the illustrations: In the illustrations that follow, the vertical distance between the offeror and offeree represents the space across which they communicate. Time progresses from left to right along the horizontal axis. Relatively slow communications appear as slanted lines, therefore, while relatively instantaneous ones appear as vertical lines. Unless otherwise noted, "rejection" stands for "rejection or counter-offer."

  2. Caveats: These illustrations address generic contract formation; that is, they assume that the offerors have not put special conditions on the proper mode of acceptance, that acceptance is in a manner and by a medium invited by the offer, and that option contracts are not at issue.

  3. Standard acceptance (effective at "X")
    
                                                             
    OFFEROR: offer receipt of effective acceptance
    \ /
    \ /
    \ X
    OFFEREE: acceptance

  4. Lost acceptance (effective at "X")
    
                                                             
    OFFEROR: offer
    \ ? acceptance lost
    \ /
    \ X
    OFFEREE: acceptance

  5. Revocation trumped by earlier acceptance (eff. at "X")
    
                                                             
    OFFEROR: offer revocation receipt of effective acc.
    \ | /
    \ |/
    \ /
    \ /|
    \ X v
    OFFEREE: acceptance rec't of ineffect. revocation

  6. Rejection trumped by earlier acceptance (eff. at "X")
    
                                                            
    receipt of receipt of
    OFFEROR: offer ineff. rej. effective accept.
    \ ^ /
    \ | /
    \ |/
    \ /
    \ /|
    \ X |
    OFFEREE: acceptance rejection
    NB: But see Comment c and Illustration 7 to Restatement (2nd) § 63, providing that the offeree may be estopped to enforce the contract against an offeror who reasonably relies on the earlier-received rejection.

  7. Rejection trumped by faster revocation (effective at "X")
    
                                                             
    Offeror: offer rev. rec't of ineff. reject'n
    \ | /
    \ |/
    \ |
    \ /|
    \ / v
    OFFEREE: rejection X-rec't of effective revocat'n

  8. Revocation trumped by faster rejection (effective at "X")
    
                                                             
    OFFEROR: offer rev. X-rec't of effective reject'n
    \ \ ^
    \ \|
    \ |
    \ |\
    \ | \
    OFFEREE: rejection receipt of ineff. revocat'n

  9. Rejection trumped by later acceptance (eff. at "X")
     
    receipt of receipt of
    OFFEROR: offer eff. accept. ineffective rejection
    \ ^ /
    \ | /
    \ |/
    \ /
    \ /|
    \ / X
    OFFEREE: rejection acceptance

  10. Acceptance trumped by earlier rejection (eff. at "X")
    
                                                             
    rec't of rec't of
    OFFEROR: offer eff. rej. ineffective acceptance
    \ X /
    \ / /
    \ / /
    \ / /
    \ / /
    \ / /
    OFFEREE: rejection acceptance
    NB: Even though here the acceptance is sent before the receipt of the rejection, Restatement (2nd) § 40 modifies the mailbox rule to provide that a prior-sent rejection or counter-offer will, if received before the putative acceptance, render that acceptance a mere counter-offer.

  11. A Puzzle: Rejection, Revocation, or Acceptance?
    
                                                            
    rec't rec't of
    OFFEROR: offer revocat'n of rej. acceptance
    \ \ ? /
    \ \ / /
    \ \ / /
    \ /\ /
    \ / /
    \ / ? \
    OFFEREE: rejection acc. ?-receipt of
    revocation
    NB: E, supra, suggests that the acceptance sent prior to the receipt of the revocation will trump that revocation. G, supra, suggests that the prior-received revocation will trump the later-received rejection or counter-offer. J, supra, suggests that the rejection or counter-offer sent prior to and received before the acceptance will trump that acceptance.


Access other teaching materials.
Return to Tom W. Bell's Homepage.


(C) 1998-2002 Tom W. Bell. All rights reserved. Fully attributed noncommercial use of this document permitted if accompanied by this paragraph.


The Mailbox Rule and Related Rules - tomwbell@tomwbell.com - v. 2002/08/17